1 week
from brief to campaign out, from three months
The brief, the asset list, the copy, and the sizes are ready on day one, and every review round lands in one place instead of five threads.
What changes
A campaign out in a week, not a quarter
Design rarely slows down on the designing. It slows down on the round trips: collecting notes, chasing an approval, hunting for the final file. Those are the ones worth measuring, and the dates are already recorded.
2 rounds
of revisions instead of six
Feedback arrives as one consolidated list with the contradictions flagged, so a round is a round rather than three people asking for opposite things.
0
“where's the final file?” messages
Every version is named to your convention, filed, and linked in the channel the moment it's exported.
Check it yourself. Brief created, first review, approved, shipped: four dates your project tool and file history already hold. Compare one project before and one after. These are the targets we hold Gini to, not an average across customers.
The first week
Three jobs to hand over first
Pick the one you repeat every week. Gini does it end to end, shows its work in the channel, then offers to keep running it on a cadence.
01
At each review
One feedback list per round
Gathers every comment from the design file, the channels, and the docs into a single grouped list, with the contradictions flagged.
02
Daily while a project is live
Chase the approvals
Tracks who still has to sign off, nudges them, and names the blocker plainly when something is stuck.
03
When a design is approved
Name, export, and file everything
Exports each placement from the approved frame, names it to your convention, and links it in the channel.
It reaches the tools design teams already run on
Scoped per person · revocable in one click
Figma
Design files
Asana
Projects
Notion
Briefs
Google Drive
Assets
Adobe CC
Production
Loom
Walkthroughs
Webflow
Web
Google Slides
Presentations
Plus 200+ more integrations. Gini only reaches what you connect, with the permissions of the person who connected it.
The differenceA chatbot generates an image.
A chatbot generates an image.
Gini gets it approved.
Generation was never the bottleneck. The bottleneck is five people's notes in four threads and a stakeholder who hasn't looked since Tuesday.
Feedback in one place
An assistant
“Ask your stakeholders for feedback.”
You still do the work
Gini
Collected every note on v3 from four threads into one list, flagged where marketing and legal want opposite things, and asked them to settle it.
One list · conflicts surfaced
Autonomous, not unsupervised
How security worksOnly the channels you invite it to
No workspace-wide ingestion. Remove Gini from a channel and its access ends with the membership.
Approval before anything leaves
Money moving, anything client-facing, anything sent on your behalf: it drafts, then waits for a one-tap OK.
Your data never trains a model
Encrypted in transit and at rest, isolated per workspace, and deletable whenever you ask.
Questions
FAQ
Day one
Hire Gini for your design team
Two minutes of setup, then one job. Nothing to migrate, nobody to train, and one seat covers the whole workspace.
Invite Gini to #design-review
Install from the Slack app directory. It arrives like a new teammate and sees only the channels you add it to.
Connect Figma, Asana, and Notion
Each connection is scoped to the person who made it and revocable in one click.
Hand it “One feedback list per round”
Gini runs it, shows its work in the channel, then offers to keep it on a cadence.
On Teams? It's rolling out by invite. Ask for a spot and we'll hold it.
One coworker, every other team too
Same seat, different week